Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Thomson (footballer, born 1988)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

David Thomson (footballer, born 1988)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and the WP:NFOOTY consensus that you have to have played more than one match in a fully professional league to qualify for a standalone article. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - oh dear, not good at all. --Huligan0 (talk) 20:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesnt meet notability guidelines for athletes. Webmaster862 (talk) 04:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't matter if he played one game or 100 games, if there is no WP:SIGCOV then the subjects fails WP:GNG. Alvaldi (talk) 11:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep passes NFOOTY, and still has active career.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.