Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Wearing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

David Wearing

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet notability criteria in Notability (academics), under any of the criteria listed there. Samuelshraga (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 21:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks well WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2017 PhD and newly minted lecturer.  For WP:NAUTHOR, the one book looks like a good start, and it looks like redirection to a stub on the book could be an alternative to deletion, but I think it's a WP:BLP1E for the author.  Little sign of GNG or of other notability criteria. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 21:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as above: WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC).
 * Delete His one book was published in 2018 but has only 30 citations in G-scholar. That's about all there is for scholarship and it doesn't meet NPROF. I don't find any 3rd party sources about him; most of what is here are bios that accompany non-academic journal articles, and those are usually submitted by the author himself. Lamona (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete,  WP:TOOSOON  Alex-h (talk) 16:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.