Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Weekley Homes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

David Weekley Homes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that this meets WP:ORG Most reliable sources are typical news reports; no indication that this passes WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:ORGIND. Bneu2013 (talk) 06:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article created and edited by multiple WP:SPA accounts. The given sources are poor, the best being a listing at no.16 in a "2017 Builder 100". I can also see indication of some "Home Builders Association of Greater Chicago" awards : enough to confirm a company going about its business but not for WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - no independent reliable sources. The "2017 Builder 100" text is written by the company, from all the "we's" in it. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 21:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - badly fails any test of notability that I know we have. This is little more than spam (see the Builder 100 source cited above). Bearian (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.