Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Wilfrid Peters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of having met WP:GNG, no claims of notability via WP:PROF. (Note that most Who's Whos, also, are not considered reliable sources, although that depends on which publisher is being discussed.) j⚛e deckertalk 00:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

David Wilfrid Peters

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable professor; I can't turn up any sources which show that he passes WP:PROF. Almost all references are to primary sources, the only exception being a Who's Who entry for his father. Psychonaut (talk) 12:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:07, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:07, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:07, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:07, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete -- can't find enough sources to assert notability on any of the WP:PROF guidelines. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 22:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 22:51, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Google search indicates he doesn't pass WP:PROF with no references to his work and no strong WP:RS unfortunately. --Artene50 (talk) 23:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.