Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Zenon Jacome-Moreira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 17:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

David Zenon Jacome-Moreira

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Autobiography of a graduate student. I declined a speedy for "autobiography", as that is not a speedy criterion; but it does make us look closely at the evidence for notability. As an MS/MBA student hoping to go on to a PhD, he is evidently nowhere near the standard of WP:Notability (academics), and his activity in organizations like the Society of Physics Students does not seem to me to be enough for general notability. The organization "Physics Connection" of which he is founder and CEO has a snazzy login page, but I have not found any other trace of it beyond mention on a Facebook page. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per WP:PROMOTION. The article was created for himself with the alias . --Taichi (talk) 00:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reference 1 is a WP:SPS regarding SPS.  Reference 2 makes no mention of the article subject.  Reference 3 includes only a mention in a list of committee members.  References 4 and 5 are research papers by the subject, not secondary sources.  Agree that it's WP:Promotion that also fails WP:BASIC. Sailsbystars (talk) 03:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF, and the list of minor accomplishments in the article looks more like a cv than like anything a Wikipedia reader would be likely to find interesting or helpful. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.