Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David kenny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Wizardman 05:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

David kenny

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject is not notable and the article -which lacks any sources whatsoever and is orphaned- requires a massive amount of cleaning up and wikifying. &Lambda; u α (Operibus anteire) 08:40, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete, no real notability asserted. article as currently written is a mess. J I P  | Talk 12:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The article does assert notability. I can see how it could be taken as a hoax, but he writes a column for The Sunday Tribune. Here is a review of one of his books in The Irish Times. I'll take the jokey stuff out of the article and add some references.  Bláthnaid   talk  16:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The current version of the page is as a stub, and is need of expanding. However, from what I could tell doing a cursory Google search, he is a relatively well known author in Ireland. I added a source for the second version of his book Erindipidity. Lazulilasher (talk) 13:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 06:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I can't seem to fnd anything which supports notability.
 * Cheers mates!
 * &Lambda; u α (Operibus anteire) 13:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Notable person, bad article. And the page should be moved to David Kenny. Tezkag72 (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ya, I just noticed that....and it was moved :) Lazulilasher (talk) 22:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Your welcome. Tavix (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah...there you are, thanks! Lazulilasher (talk) 05:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.