Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davies baronets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Davies baronets

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Source is a passing mention, could not find anything but passing mentions in two books, not notable by WP:GNG. VTVL (talk) 11:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and England. Shellwood (talk) 11:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Seems like most of the articles in Category:Extinct baronetcies in the Baronetage of England would fall under this criteria as well. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article itself states that nothing is known of the sole recipient of this peerage except that he had no descendants, which is supported by a search that found absolutely nothing outside of Wikipedia mirrors. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.