Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davilex Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Davilex Games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP due to a lack of reliable, significant sources. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete per nom, fails WP:NCORP. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 19:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'm seeing some stuff in a foreign language that may be RS, so am re-listing.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write)  00:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep I don't speak Dutch or French but from what I can tell using GTranslate, these     (also one in German) seem like reliable sources covering the subject in detail. Maybe someone speaking Dutch and/or French can confirm? Regards  So  Why  14:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Gamekings is the most prominent gaming outlet in the Netherlands, see also its wiki page. Not familiar enough with the others. I'd also like to point to the Dutch wikipedia article, which includes articles from Tweakers and the NRC Handelsblad newspaper. GameLegend (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  So  Why  14:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * , how does the Dutch coverage look? Any suggested additions to the above? czar  07:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I had never heard of Apparata.nl and Sprout before, and these websites don't look bad, but I currently don't feel comfortable saying anything one way or another about them. Gamekings is indeed very prominent in the Netherlands, and though I don't like the outlet, it is probably considered a reliable source. The Dutch Wikipedia article is a bit odd, as we have one for the company and one for its games division. The interview on Tweakers I would consider reliable and useful, the NRC Handelsblad article would also be useful if it were still available. Either way, this should be enough sources for a keep. ~ Mable ( chat ) 11:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 23:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for my late reply. I found this article be Gamer.nl, which is another Dutch language video game website. It's not in the WP:VG/RS, but from my experience it is more serious and adult-oriented than the adolescent target audience by Power Unlimited, which is listed. In the Netherlands' Alexa rankings, Power Unlimited ranks 1215, Gamer.nl ranks 1690. With the other sources, I also would vote keep. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Gamer.nl is pretty decent. I would personally definitely prefer it over Power Unlimited if I were looking for Dutch gaming news. ~ Mable ( chat ) 12:49, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't tell whether that Gamer.nl story is a repackaged press release or just a bad machine translation (if the former, then it won't be much help for independent notability) czar  17:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.