Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davison Carvalho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Davison Carvalho

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Unable to find reliable sources independent of this artist in order to establish notability this very long standing unreferenced BLP. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:Notability (people). J04n(talk page) 20:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 20:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - appears to be non-notable. I looked at one of the gnews results however the article concerned someone else of the same name. PhilKnight (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - the interviews (e.g.) seem to have been valid when the article was written, though one is now 404, and much source material would I suspect be Portuguese or Japanese. Rich Farmbrough, 16:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC).

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as non-notable designer per lack of independent reliable secondary sources. Algébrico (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.