Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DawgHouse Entertainment

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

DawgHouse Entertainment
Article about a nonexistent record label. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball&mdash;Delete JeremyA 03:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Sn0wflake 03:38, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Xcali 03:48, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established. Megan1967 04:58, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and marked as such. &mdash; Phil Welch 05:06, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per reason above. - Mailer Diablo 07:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not yet notable. Thue | talk 11:52, 29 May 2005 (UTC)


 * I don't understand why this was VfDed, as it was already (and correctly) marked as a speedy; it was simply a bit of silliness by a bored adolescent. I've deleted it. Mel Etitis  ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 13:05, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.