Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Gentry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per WP:G10 as mentioned by several !voters. There is no need to draw this discussion out. We are also already venturing into WP:SNOW delete territory Eddie891 Talk Work 01:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Dawn Gentry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E applies. WP:BLPCRIME requires convictions, not accusations or investigations, lest we generate attack pages. Without the coverage of this judge's apparent misconduct, I posit the subject is a low-profile individual. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 12:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, this is simply news. Caro7200 (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable and violation of BLP. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G10 (attack page) and maybe REVDEL and salt. Nothing but an attack article on a non-public figure, who has been accused but not convicted of several things. Take out the NOTNEWS BLP violations and there is nothing left to put in the article. Wikipedia should not be hosting this. HouseOfChange (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I blocked the author of this - it's an edit pattern very similar to UPE spammers, except this time the content is different. MER-C 16:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG. Also, meets criteria for WP:ATTACK, I agree with . Angus1986 (talk) 17:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G10. Normal Op (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It is time to rid Wikipedia of unsourced articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.