Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Tiura Evans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 16:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Dawn Tiura Evans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Executive of questionable notability; article added by an apparent WP:COI account. Of the provided references for industry awards, I'm not finding the subject listed when doing a text search. A Google News search on "Dawn Tiura Evans" shows only one result. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, It's more like a cv than an article... — →Davey 2010→ Talk to me!→  21:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm new to this, so apologize if I'm not responding correctly. I removed the part that sounded CV-ish and added external verifiable links. User:Sholliman —Preceding undated comment added 23:30, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - still CV'ish, unsourced, and no indication of notability. Could be redirected to Sourcing Interests Group (SIG) but I have my doubts as to its notability as well. --MelanieN (talk) 03:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. 199.168.146.146 (talk) 16:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC) — 199.168.146.146 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete, subject has received very brief mention in three non-primary reliable sources but none of those come near close to WP:SIGCOV. Therefore the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.