Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn of the Beast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 22:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Dawn of the Beast

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested prod. Fails GNG and NFILM; this video doesn't have reviews categorized by Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic, and searching I only see non-notable critics/horror blogs covering this. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 19:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * comment looks like there’s at least an AV Club review, plus a couple of others from lesser publications. Artw (talk) 20:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Rue Morgue and Horror Society are reliable sources, not to mention the earlier coverage on the production by other reliable sources.★Trekker (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * What makes them reliable sources? WikiProject Horror/Sources just lists Horror Society, for example, as "reliable" with no evidence or discussion demonstrating consensus. What are the reliable sources covering the production? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 15:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * We at the horror project discuss sources on the project talkpage before they're added to the list.★Trekker (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * And can you point me to those discussions so there's actual evidence these are reliable sources that meet WP:GNG? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 18:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Feel free to look at the history of the talk page of the Horror project.★Trekker (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you're talking about this discussion, it's all of three people and frankly doesn't demonstrate a high understanding of what makes a reliable source. Just having an editorial staff is not enough. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 18:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Feel free to go to the Horror project and point out any issues with the sources that you think make them unreliable to cover horror fiction.★Trekker (talk) 12:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per Trekker. Artw (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep based on sources provided by Trekker.Lovewiki106 (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * keep based on the new sources provided by Artw and Trekker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zekab (talk • contribs) 23:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as article is well sourced. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.