Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn patrol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep as useful disambig page. A Train take the 20:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Dawn patrol
I don't think anyone knows what this is. It is unencyclopedic and it may qualify for "speedy deletion", but I can't "speedy delete" by my values. And I don't know if it's a disruptive article from a user or not, but that page has to go, unless an author improves this article. Gh87 18:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete No references noted, and lack of purpose. I don't regard it as being encyclopedic, hence Wikipedia isn't the place for it. Bungle44 19:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Edison 19:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There actually is a reference of sorts, but it's still not the sort of thing an encyclopedia article should be. Coemg e nus 19:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per CDS A1 (db-nocontext). Agent 86 19:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Now I replaced afd with what it is suggested above. --Gh87 20:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Close WP:SNOW. Just H 20:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and Close extremely short of context and no references cited.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I have changed it into a disambiguation page as there are an awful lot of things called "Dawn patrol". The disambiguation page no longer qualifies for speedy and should be Kept. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk 20:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.