Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day Before (Film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Day Before (Film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I have searched and had no luck turning up any independent secondary reliable sources to indicate that this film has had any coverage to pass WP:NFILMS. It was deproded by the original author, and after being reprodded by a different editor, it was then deproded by an SPA anon IP. This $8000 budget film short just doesn't seem to be notable, as I can't find any significant press/media coverage of it. This appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:53, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Considering that it was released in 2010 and still has yet to get any sort of reliable coverage of it, it's unlikely that it will pass WP:NFILMS anytime before the end of the AfD. The only thing I see going for it is that it has been screened after its initial release in 2010, but that in itself won't show notability unless it'd been screened at a festival 5 years after its initial release. (Even then, I'm not sure if that would count all festivals, or just ones that Wikipedia considers notable.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet WP:NFILMS.  Zappa  O  Mati   22:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not so much "TOO SOON", as the film has screened... but more simply a failure of WP:NF in that it did not receive the requisite coverage in reliable sources. As it screened in South Africa, is it possible it had non-English coverage under a different title?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: perhaps an exercize in futility, but I just made the thing somewhat prettier.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.