Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day MDZ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Day MDZ

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not convinced that there's enough independent coverage to satisfy WP:NBIO - seems to be sourced to advertorials/PR pieces. KH-1 (talk) 05:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians,  and Businesspeople. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, every single source was garbage SEO/PR advertorials or just flat-out fake articles. Could not locate anything independent. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Blatant attempt to use WP as a means for promotion.-- Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 20:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.