Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day of Celebration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Day of Celebration

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:EVENT. This was a one time event that fails WP:EFFECT, WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:INDEPTH, WP:PERSISTENCE and WP:DIVERSE, all the requirements for Notability (events). As an orphan stub it should be deleted. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 16:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete one-time church service (admittedly a big one, but not spectacularly so in the Megachurch era) with no apparent lasting impactor signifigance.  Might be worth a mention at, but no merge or redirect. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure its work mentioning at ether.  I have been to event like this in the past that had much more people.  One was at the rose bowl (and I can't even remember it's name now) and it's not listed there.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 18:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I was thinking "weak delete" but then found one extra source. With that in the article, I'm now sitting on the fence. bobrayner (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Two news sources with no further coverage that don't detail any lasting impact aren't enough to meet WP:EVENT. But it's all verifiable and encyclopedic and an appropriate merge target exists, so there's no reason to get rid of it altogether. Alzarian16 (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, there are currently and have been in the past a large number of events of this type (see Nauvoo pageant and Manti Pageant as current examples) that are not listed at "Social events and gatherings". I think including this as a merge to that page would be inappropriate, unless someone wants to figure out which of the events are notable enough to included there.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 14:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete While I do like the idea of "a traditional Māori haka and concluding remarks by the current president of the church", I can't see the event being particularly notable except, perhaps, for those present. If it had established some kind of Guinness record, maybe. Otherwise, no. Peridon (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.