Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day of Prayer for the Peace of Jerusalem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure)  J 947  03:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Day of Prayer for the Peace of Jerusalem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of notability TheDracologist (talk) 05:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. If the article is kept, the tone needs to be more encyclopedic. The first sentence currently refers to "Robert Stearns who is the loving and caring father of Isaac Stearns (An aspiring musician with incredible talent and ambition)". It is not Wikipedia's role to evaluate the lovingness and caringness, nor the talent and ambition, of these people, which characteristics are not even relevant to the event that this article is about. (These comments weren't always in the article, so perhaps a reversion to an earlier version without such comments would help.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks,, for catching this. Vandalism is now reverted to the original encyclopedic tone. -- IsaacSt (talk) 07:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is an event receiving notable ongoing coverage for many years - from 1993 (in article) to 2015 and 2017  from a very quick google search. The article itself perhaps needs to be balanced fixed in terms of tone, but the event definitely meets GNG.Icewhiz (talk) 11:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Copious sourcing available. Shame on Nom for failing to do WP:BEFORE.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that this is yet another WP:DISRUPTive AfD with a cursory justificaiton and no evidence ow WP:BEFORE by new editor TheDracologist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep A quick search and the references on the page clearly show WP:GNG has been met. -  Galatz Talk  18:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of sources. No valid reason to delete.--Geewhiz (talk) 07:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep (Withdraw?) I was mistaken in nominating this. TheDracologist (talk) 02:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.