Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayalnagar Colony


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Visakhapatnam. (non-admin closure) Steven   Crossin  03:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Dayalnagar Colony

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Its just a suburb of Visakhapatnam city and without any Relable Sources and hence not notable as per WP:Notability—IM3847 (talk) 15:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep no rationale provided for deletion. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a very small area, 27 acres and 196 houses. There could be an article if it met GNG. I found one source to confirm it exists .  The article can be expanded from this source, but it's still probably not enough for GNG. I don't quite understand the use of "colony" here and whether that would make this place "legally recognized" per WP:GEOLAND. MB 04:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * "Colony" should be considered a nonce word here, like "Park" or "Place". It doesn't mean that this was ever an independent colony. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Please check Articles for deletion/Pathebada, Articles for deletion/Venkatraopet, Eluru and Articles for deletion/Narasimharao Pet for articles that are Neighbourhoods of a city.


 * Redirect to Visakhapatnam per WP:ATD-R. Might not be notable on its own but can easily be redirected instead of deleted. Regards  So Why  16:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.