Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daybreak Pacific


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 03:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Daybreak Pacific

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:CORP. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 15:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete or Userfy per nom. I can't find any sources for this company. -- MISTER ALCOHOL  TC 04:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  23:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete and Merge I will find a source, and put the production information on each film or television production's page, if it exists and has a page. "http://www.daybreakpacific.com/" states that the registration has expired, and as such I will remove it. Treedel (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, Variety magazine article directly addressing topic, satisfies WP:NOTE. About eight trivial mentions on NZ Herald also. XLerate (talk) 03:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Unless there are other reasons (like awards or notable events) to keep the article, the requirement is multiple reliable indepedent sources. One isn't enough. Any more? - Mgm|(talk) 00:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: incorrect, WP:NOTE states "Multiple sources are generally preferred". Besides there are multiple sources, just not in depth. . XLerate (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.