Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daykey High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Daykey High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extremely short  stub (although  this is alone not  a reason for deletion), but although it  may  exist, searches for even a Korean language website under 대기고등학교, have revealed only  social  media listings. Does not therefore meet WP:GNG, and the lack  of further reliable information confirming  it  as a mainstream K12 school would fail  our precedent  for keeping High Schools. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  22:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  22:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: Try this Korean-language search for the school`s name: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=ca&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=%EB%8C%80%EA%B8%B0%EA%B3%A0%EB%93%B1%ED%95%99%EA%B5%90&oq=%EB%8C%80%EA%B8%B0%EA%B3%A0%EB%93%B1%ED%95%99%EA%B5%90&gs_l=news-cc.12..43j43i53.1035.13802.0.18188.2.2.0.0.0.0.142.255.0j2.2.0...0.0...1ac.1.rKrvKbD6fps     Eastmain (talk • contribs)  22:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Neutral, awaiting clarification - I can't understand machine-translated Korean well enough to tell if anything in the search above is of use. Is there a Korean-reading editor out there willing to check? Ansh666 04:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Try pinging  someone from Category:Wikipedians in Seoul. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Will have to wait. I'm sleeping now and busy tomorrow. Thanks for the suggestion, though. Ansh666 05:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per long-standing consensus for reasons endlessly reiterated that articles on verified secondary schools are kept. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * This one is a bit special - is it verifiable? Ansh666 03:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Its existence certainly seems to be verifiable. That's enough. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per longstanding consensus that secondary schools of verified existence are inherently notable. Carrite (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.