Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daymen Rycroft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Daymen Rycroft

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG per only WP:ROUTINE sources. Never played in a high enough league or won any major awards to pass WP:NHOCKEY (best he had was most goals in a season in low minor league and All-Rookie team). Yosemiter (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Appears to fail - confirming Yosemiters conclusions Bill McKenna (talk) 21:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 19:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA&#160;<b style="color:pink">(talk)</b></i> 19:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   22:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ifnord (talk) 19:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Making the all-rookie team and playing on a team that won a collegiate conference championship are insufficient to meet WP:NHOCKEY and the coverage appears to be just routine sports reporting. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.