Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daytime Shooting Star


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Margaret (magazine). Redirect to magazine in which it was published. If somebody would like to merge some content there, this is still available in the article history. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Daytime Shooting Star

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Search for reliable third-party sources only turns illegal scanlation websites. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BK. Even Anime News Network's encyclopedia doesn't contain an entry on this. Article is almost entirely WP:PLOT. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. To my surprise, ja:ひるなかの流星 actually has a couple sources. I don't know if they're in any way useful, but due diligence. --erachima talk 18:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Two references from the same site. However from that site it appears the series is involved with a clothing label (Comic Natalie link: ).SephyTheThird (talk) 19:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm at work and can't view Anime News Network right now, but I remember them having an article saying the series got a clothing line. I assume that is referring to the same thing as that Japanese site. Calathan (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interest/2014-05-25/daytime-shooting-star-shojo-manga-gets-clothing-line/.74746 SephyTheThird (talk) 19:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - About the manga not being in Anime News Network's encyclopedia, that doesn't really reflect whether the series is notable, but instead just reflects that it hasn't been released in the United States. There are far more manga submitted in Anime News Network's submission queue than the staff has time to add, so series that have been released in the US or that are by mangaka who are well known in the US get priority to be added.  A manga can be pretty well known in Japan and still not be in the Encyclopedia if it hasn't been released in the US. Calathan (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, with no good references to be found there is not anything that can be worked on for improvement. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 15:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep: I added the two Kai-You articles, if it's any help. static shakedown ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ  18:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * This AfD should have been closed or relisted several days ago. No arguments have been presented to explain why this isn't a plausible redirect to the magazine in which it was published. James500 (talk) 13:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.