Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daze (Eurodance band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Davewild (talk) 08:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Daze (Eurodance band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article cites one source, which is a listing that includes the name only and is in any case a primary source. It has never had any other sources and it reads as a personal essay or opinion. Guy (Help!) 09:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --   -- Lear's Fool 10:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. TI'm having trouble finding reliable sources here, but there's a few hints that this may be a notable band.  Last FM suggests that their first single was a very good seller.  That said, the article does need a rewrite.  I'll keep looking around.  -- Lear's Fool 11:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree the article is not exactly in ideal condition, the subject is however notable. I'll try to dig up some more sources. I wasn't really planning to work on a crappy eurodance band so was hoping the source i found yesterday would be enough - but I guess not! --Harthacnut (talk) 14:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * More sources added and the worst of the opinion stuff removed. Please indicate if more is needed. --Harthacnut (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - Passes WP:BAND. There are enough reliable sources (including a blurb from Billboard magazine) to verify all the text. Although the band appears to have been a flash in the pan, it's multi-platinum debut album and a Danish Grammy Award for best dance album pass our notability criteria. —  Cactus Writer (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - found enough coverage in Billboardmagazine to keep under WP:BAND. KVIKountry (talk) 00:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.