Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dazzeloids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No deletion rationale has been given, and numerous arguments have been presented for keeping the article. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Dazzeloids

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

FishandChipper 🐟🍟 09:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 09:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment What is your deletion rationale? Jumpytoo Talk 16:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No Rationale (Over 24 hours) PerryPerryD Talk To Me 23:55, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per PerryPerryD. It's got two high quality sources and no deletion rationale so I'm struggling to intuit what the nominator's objection is. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found a PC Gamer review, a discussion from Magazine of International Design, Volume 42, Issues 1-4, and also another book. Together with the NY Times coverage IMHO notability is met.  VickKiang  (talk)  03:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.