Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dazzie Dee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. slakr \ talk / 02:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Dazzie Dee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. They lack the significant coverage in reliable sources required to have an article. Most of the refs are complete crap, all random low level blogs. Only reliable ones are an AllMusic entry (no biography or chart performance) and Billboard, which are only passing mentions, with no in depth coverage. STATic message me!   23:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I wanna keep this article as long as the artist is notable, this discussion is taking long time. --OriginalDoc (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete The only thing I could come up with was him hitting the billboard chart at number 25 for a single on Google Books. This isn't enough to meet WP:MUSICBIO to me, but hints that there may be more out there buried deep someplace if someone wants to dig. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 00:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment :* The artist has more than one single, which they didn't make it to BillBoard 100, you should have checked more pages instead of that one, these pages and magazines/books belong to BillBoard (of 1990s), in which of these 20+ pages Dazzie Dee is involved in and not just mentions. I can say that in fact he is notable for his works with notable artists such as Ice Cube and more. There are multiple sources, third party and interviews that claim Dazzie's notability, such as AllMusic, BillBoard, DubCNN (West Coast Network news & local magazine), LA Times (article) and more. I think you could contribute and help me too, instead of being so 'harm'.. Have you checked Magioladiti's response to page talk?.. And I made some updates to that page.

"This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it contains references (I can't assure the quality but it is certainly referenced)."

--OriginalDoc (talk) 11:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I should have been clearer, I meant the only thing I could find in addition to what STATicVapor offered. Mostly passing mentions or video clips (which I don't have the data to watch as I'm on a limited bandwidth). — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 11:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Multiple reliable observers have covered the subject.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 00:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 00:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 00:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep per above, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  01:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.