Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. We have 2 for delete, as well as several suggestions to merge the content of this article into a more general article (one of whom provides the third Delete !vote if no suitable merge target can be found). The suggestion to merge with Quest for the Code into a new general article did not come to fruition, because that article survived its own AfD. There are good suggestions to create an article like Diabetes education games for children, however since that article doesn't yet exist, it will require someone taking some initiative to start constructing that, finding additional examples, etc. So for now, I will delete this article. However, if someone wants to take on the task of creating a more general article about games of this type, I would be happy to draftify this article under a title of your choice - just drop a message on my talk page - and let you work on adapting it. ST47 (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently non-notable game--all the refs are either mentions in the context in general discussions of the many such games, or press releases. We should have instead of this an article on the general topic of Diabetes education games for children. Forthat, there are sufficient sources.  DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

I would suggest a Merge to a topic around Diabetes education games for children but could not find any thing. I would suggest Delete if nothing suitable can be found to merge Spy-cicle (talk) 13:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Suggestion - as there is another health-related game up for deletion, Quest for the Code, perhaps a way forward would be to create a new article entitled something like Health Educational Games which could serve as a home for these and any other health related games - alternately, there is an article Games for Health which could be expanded to include games like Quest for the Code and Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids - Epinoia (talk) 02:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * This seems like a pretty solid solution which I would back. Spy-cicle (talk) 17:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - the result of the Quest for the Code AfD was Keep, so this suggestion is no longer viable, unless other health-related games could be found to make an article - Epinoia (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Move to Health education games for children and tag for expansion. It can be covered under that topic. I would suggest that after that a merger discussion can then begin at Talk:Quest for the Code, because although it passed an AFD, sometimes it's best to lump smaller notable topics into one article to prevent content forking.4meter4 (talk) 14:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly fails WP:GNG. I am sympathetic to merging somewhere or even creating a page on Dbaza. However, we can't keep an article in the hope that someone will write a page. Even if Diabetes education games for children or Health education games for children articles are created this game may not be sufficiently notable for inclusion unless someone is prepared to create a comprehensive list of the relevant games. The concept of creating a broad topic page, Health education games for children, for just one game of many, simply cannot be right. Sorry, but for now, deletion is the only option. 2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0 (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.