Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeAgostini Hellas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete. Renaming/rewriting is an editorial task, it doesn't seem like anyone actually wants to delete the article at his point, so I'll close the AFD. W.marsh 22:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

DeAgostini Hellas

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Only 5 non-wiki ghits in English, none of which show notability. No sources offered in article to show notability. Contested prod. Fabrictramp 20:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Rename to De Agostini Editore or perhaps even Gruppo De Agostini, which appears to be the parent company ; neither currently appear to have an article. From what I can tell without reading Italian De Agostini Editore appears to be a major multinational publishing company, of which the Greek company is just one branch. "De Agostini Editore" has 47,400 Google hits, and "De Agostini" publishing gives 218,000 . Espresso Addict 22:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't know what he have to do really. DeAgostini Hellas is a famous company in Greece because it makes many commercials. On the other hand, if it is an international company there is no need to have a special article for the Greek branch since theres is not much valuable information. I would say merge with DeAgostini Editore but article doesn't exist! -- Magioladitis 00:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * After reading Espresso Addict's comment, this is also how I feel. Anyone want to volunteer to write it? :) --Fabrictramp 00:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: There's this and then there's also this, the later being - acording to the italian article-, a joint venture between the first and es:Grupo Planeta. And they all seem notable. :) Cattus talk 18:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Daniel  04:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.