Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeArrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

DeArrow

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lacking WP:GNG - Found only two sources, both of which lack depth of coverage; I feel these do not constitute reliable sources nor display significant coverage. Ingrinder (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ingrinder (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete had a bit of coverage but mostly of the press release type, so even within the techsphere not really notable yet. Skynxnex (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  22:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Fully promotional only online coverage I can find is press releases no devolepement or reception info. Only citation is to its github.Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikibooks, then delete Encyclopedically useful, but not notable enough. Erkin Alp Güney 05:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article fails WP:GNG, WP:NSOFT, and WP:NORG (via WP:PRODUCT). I similarly could not find any sources online that would contribute to the subject's notability. - Aoidh (talk) 16:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.