Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Agostini UK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No consensus to delete. The article has already been tagged with a merge proposal so that discussion can take place on the article's talk page (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

De Agostini UK

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declining speedy deletion as spam, taking to AfD out of respect for the tagger, A More Perfect Onion ... he may know something I don't. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep - the article needs references and de-spamming, but it's about a notable company. . . Rcawsey (talk) 20:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable publisher. See, e.g. The cut-throat world of partworks publishing Print Week Feb 05, or .  I've briefly copyedited the article to fix the most blatant problems. JulesH (talk) 13:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That said, merging to the parent company's article (De Agostini) may be sensible from a purely stylistic standpoint. I'm going to tag the pages as a proposed merge. JulesH (talk) 13:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.