Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Mens (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. PROD is invalid for articles that have been through AfD previously; the tag could have been summarily removed on those grounds, especially given that the first AfD was only a couple weeks ago. — TKD::Talk 02:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

De Mens
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The previous AFD was closed on 1 August. On 9 August, the article was introduced into the WP:PROD workstream by User:IPSOS with the edit comment "guess nobody intends to establish notability, prod". I would suggest this be speedy-closed, but am bringing this here as a procedural nomination - IPSOS effectively re-AFD'd the article by PRODing it. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, speedy if you like. The article hasn't changed since the last AfD, my arguments have changed neither. --B. Wolterding 11:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per WP:MUSIC. Band has put out 4 albums on Play It Again, Sam Records, whose roster includes Sigur Ros and Front 242, among others. Also signed with Universal--Sethacus 16:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as from the article the band certainly meets the albums/label notability criteria on WP:MUSIC. The article needs sources though ;) EyeSereneTALK 18:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.