Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Stafford School (Caterham)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and improve. Consensus seems to have moved towards keeping and improving the article, and has been tagged as such. A merge can still be considered on the articles talk page. Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

De Stafford School (Caterham)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

English middle school with no assertion of notability. Fails WP:SCHOOL — BradV 21:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is actually a high school. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 22:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to the locality at Caterham. Eóin (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Switch to keep. I am not convinced as to having plenty of sources but significance to its local community leads me to change. Eóin (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a UK-style high school (11-16) with a teacher honored for service to education. Claims of improvement seem to be supported by the Ofsted inspection report. Encyclopedic content apparently can be developed to satisfy proposed WP:SCHOOL primary criteria. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * keep If it's a high school, it's probably notable... Hobit (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant high school in its community and plenty of sources available to meet WP:N .                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Needs work but that is a tagging not an AfD matter. TerriersFan (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.