Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Suarez d'Aulan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one (or two) keeps don't make any sense in terms of our policies or guidelines.  Sandstein  18:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

De Suarez d'Aulan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems very essay-like and unreferenced in a way that would be quite difficult and time-consuming to correct. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  22:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  22:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  22:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because the text is virtually identical:
 * Comment there are two articles about the same subject. Created on 2018-09-15T22:38:37 is De Suarez d’Aulan, created on 2018-09-28T22:42:35 is De Suarez d'Aulan (the only difference is the punctuation mark, one uses a quotation mark, the other an apostrophe. Vexations (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello everyone,

I understand that there are two of the same article except for minor vocabulary changes, this was an accident, however my sources and information are valid and authentic. I have noted the online sources in the reference section and the only other source is a lone recently discovered ‘members list’ of the “Jockey Club of Paris” from 1973. Inside of this list/information booklet is the entire collection of all the club’s members and the history of the families. I plan on writing more articles about more of these families in the future as I am a Historian studying European Nobility and I wish to share information on these many families who are unknown on the worlds web and who’s story should be know.

I believe it to be a shame to delete the smaller parts of our history and only keep the large important parts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henry.Ewood (talk • contribs) 22:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * That is precisely what an encyclopedia does: winnow the field. --Bejnar (talk) 04:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep But needs a lot of re-writing. EricPfromTustin (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete both articles (same text). One book by François d'Aulan as a source, and two listings. This lineage article fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 04:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This heap of sentences and words thrown together does not pass WP:AFC, and as the OP stated, it would take a lot to elevate it to WP standards. But more dammening, the info is simply inaccurate as it stands. The history of the family name, as claimed here, is not actual, cohesive, and thus, it is amateurship. The weak sources, or lack of reliable ones, explain it (WP:RS). I understand and also appreciate the argument for inclusion. However, with this type of subjective topic, which requires a careful hand for stitching facts and dates together, we should not simply accept any type of attempt at writing an article. Caballero / Historiador⎌ 01:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.