Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead Sea (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. North America1000 13:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Dead Sea (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable enough to have its own article. AdrianGamer (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete-Not notable, I thought this was a different game at first when I saw the deletion (don't know which I was thinking of) and was going to say keep but this is not it. Wgolf (talk) 19:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have any meaningful hits (only this) in a video game reliable sources search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ⨹   14:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned in the points above. Can't establish notability.  The1337gamer (talk) 15:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Has been covered by Tech In Asia. Not sure if it counts as a reliable source. Also covered by plenty of Thai gaming news blogs, which probably don't count. (Pinging Czar per above request.) --Paul_012 (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Tech in Asia's editorial policy says that every article is run past an editor, though they also want to break stories within minutes, so it's unclear what degree of oversight is had. I'd say it's gray in the reliability department, but I'm leaning towards okay since their work is cited by their video game reporting peers. The rest are more clear-cut: compgamer appears to have a print presence but I can't find mention of it in English video game reliable sources, coregamerth appears amateur, and Juropy doesn't have an editorial policy. I still don't see enough to qualify a dedicated article for this topic. czar ⨹   08:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.