Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead city records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Dead city records
Label shows no bands that meet WP:Music guidelines, and draws few (no more than ten) Google hits, and that includes its own website and MySpace links. Recommend delete. Consequentially 01:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - advertispamvanitynotfreewebspace - Richardcavell 02:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article is basically a copy of the about page of the company, so I would add advertisment and copyvio. -- ReyBrujo 05:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 09:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisement for a label that consists of bands that don't meet the notability guidelines... Also, copyright violation. Definite delete. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 09:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - one artist, Toilet Boys has an existing entry but the article on them is so poorly written than it probably isn't worth a merge. Ac@osr 11:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Emc² ( CONTACT ME  [[Image:Nuvola_apps_email.png|16px]]) 15:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- spam, promo material, "contact me", terrible grammar. Fnarf999 19:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Spamlicious. Buchanan-H  e  rmit™ .. SCREAM!!! ..[[Image:Flag of British Columbia.svg|24px]]..[[Image:Maple Leaf.svg|14px]] 23:54, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.