Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead escape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Bduke (talk) 08:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Dead escape

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The game is completely non-notable. For example, a Google search for "Dead Escape" (including quotation marks) does not return any information about the game in the first few hundred hits, never mind information that would establish notability. Adding "Danac" to the search criteria returns only links to the article and the creator's talk page. Furthermore, the article's creator and only substantial contributor is the creator of the game that is the subject of the article, in violation of WP:COI. —Latiligence (talk) 19:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * An additional note: I visited the game's official webpage, and not only does the game fail notability guidelines, as a finished work it doesn't even exist! I appreciate Dannac's desire to promote the project, but Wikipedia is not the place for it. Strong delete. —Latiligence (talk) 20:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete – I agree with the nominator there is nothing to be found out there on the game. Possible tag as Spam? ShoesssS Talk 20:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per the notability guideline. It doesn't qualify for speedy deletion per WP:SPAM because it's not an advert, but it's non-notable and contains no salvageable information. PeterSymonds (talk)  20:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not for promoting your new product. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM. Creator appears to be simultaneously writing the game itself and creating a Wikipedia page. When the game is released and reviewed independently, we can have a page for it. Frank  |  talk  21:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable game spam, per nom. —  Wen li  (reply here) 05:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - If I'd had the time to do a bit more digging before tagging this with a prod, I probably would have tried speedy tagging. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The game doesn't even exist yet per it's own website, and there's nothing that suggests it will be in any way notable once/if it does. --Onorem♠Dil 03:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - It's non-notable, badly written, an advert, shall I go on? It doesn't even exist?! Oh, not to mention it violates several Wikipedia policies, such as WP:CRYSTAL and WP:Notability, so yes, I think the page should be deleted.--EclipseSSD (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.