Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Deposits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any editor may create a redirect if desired. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Deadly Deposits

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I find no evidence that this film meets the notability guidelines under WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 17:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 17:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Short film lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of notability or reliable source coverage — I even did a ProQuest Canadian Newsstand Major Dailies search on it, and found a few namechecks of its existence but nothing substantive enough to support an article. I briefly had this notion that I had seen this film's name in the process of reformatting Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television Award for Best Animated Short last week, and was mentally composing a keep rationale on those grounds — but it turns out I was misremembering how and where I had seen it. Bearcat (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * alts:
 * type:
 * director:
 * writer:
 * writer:
 * studio:
 * distributor:


 * Redirect this to a sourced mention in articles on director J. Falconer (article pending) or the husband/wife writing team of Alison Snowden & David Fine. Without newspaper commentary, this still apparently has just enough "note" to have been written of in multiple books. So even without media review, we have enough verifiability for it to be written of in other places.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It seems the article creator simply didn't understand that being produced by a notable film organization doesn't confer notability onto each of its films, automatically. He says he now understands, based on an exchange one can see on the nominator's user talk page. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.