Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Weapons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Deadly Weapons

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Book cited in article, review at CineMagazine  Donald D23   talk to me  21:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * CineMagazine looks like a group blog from what I can tell (although I can't speak Dutch, so I'm limited to machine translations). Is it considered to be a non-self-published, reliable, independent source here? — Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * CineMagazine has been used on hundreds of articles and AfDs and the general consensus is that it is independent and reliable. It has editorial oversight according to its about page.  Donald D23   talk to me  21:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes the WP:GNG. The source that User:Donaldd23 suggested counts towards notability, as do the books From the Arthouse to the Grindhouse; Highbrow and Lowbrow Transgression in Cinema's First Century and 100 Cult Films that testify to the importance of the movie. That's three good sources, where only two are needed: two reviews and one cinema history discussion (From the Arthouse). gidonb (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep IMDb lists 43 reviews. After having taken a quick look at some of them, I'm convinced that this meets our notability requirements. TompaDompa (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.