Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaf Havana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Flowerparty ☀ 00:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Deaf Havana

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication of notability that I can see. AFD instead of CSD in case I am missing something. TexasAndroid (talk) 00:07, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:07, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete INsufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I still dont' see good evidence of notability and am sticking with my deleted vote. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:BAND. (see below) JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Criteria for musicians and ensembles: "Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.[note 1]"
 * Keep I believe this band reaches the notability guidelines for the following reason:

I have several full page articles published in monthly National UK Music magazines, Metal Hammer, Kerrang!, incoming band sections and live reviews I have now edited the article to reference these sources. Will this be sufficient to ensure this article is not deleted?

I also plan to add references to the following when I have time: I have album reviews in from publications Rock Sound Big Cheese which I believe adds weight to notability. I believe they have participated in a session on Kerrang Radio, as well as Kings Lynn FM although I need to find a reference to these.

There album is also available in Major record outlets HMV, available on itunes and on websites like Amazon.com External link amazon.co.ukAs far as mongolia (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete The above user has yet to prove that said sources exist, and without them we've got nothing. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC) Keep per refs 1 and 2, and Mongolia's promise to add more. Ten Pound Hammer , his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 14:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment What is the best way to prove these sources exist? I have hard copies of the Magazines which I have referenced fully on the page including issue and page numbers. What steps do I need to take to prove these sources exist, I believed a reference was sufficient? As far as mongolia (talk) 08:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to keep - references 3 and 4 look as if they come under the "merely trivial coverage... performance dates, release information" clause, but I'm prepared to give the benefit of the doubt on the basis of refs 1 and 2. JohnCD (talk) 09:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.