Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaf children's literature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted A1 by Nyttend.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  12:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Deaf children's literature

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Very short, Un-encyclopedic, possible vandalistic article Breawycker (talk to me!)  00:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I rarely recommend deletion of an article about a notable topic, but this article is insultingly bad. I will change my recommendation to "Keep" if any valiant editor is willing to transform it into a legitimate stub.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  00:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Clear speedy delete as a test page. Hairhorn (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The article makes no sense, even the link goes nowhere. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No context and I have nominated for CSD A1. Safiel (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article doesn't even contain a single full sentence. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Essentially devoid of content. J I P  &#124; Talk 06:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Deleted, this definitely was an A1 candidate. Likely a notable topic, but we don't always keep junk just because it's notable.  Nyttend (talk) 12:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.