Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deal horizon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Deal horizon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:DICDEF. Maybe transwiki to Wiktionary? Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 01:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I am usually supportive of keeping academic and business jargon, if the use is wide, and definition can be found (or derived). This, however, seems like a very niche term, I couldn't find any usage in Google Books/News, and refs are sketchy. Seems bordering on WP:OR. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Delete (See Below): re-write the article, as it is at current a dictionary defintition, and find a few more sources. It seems just about notable as a jargon term, but I'm not too sure. RailwayScientist (talk) 07:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd vote as you did but I don't see any sources for a rewrite. Do you? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I had assumed that it must be around somewhere, although a Google search reveals that you're right. Just about a delete, then, but with acknolegement that the auther wrote it in good faith. RailwayScientist (talk) 17:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now until better can be made. SwisterTwister   talk  20:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.