Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dealerbid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 22:02, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Dealerbid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources for notability Ref 1 is just a one sentence mention, ref 2 is a press release and labelled as such in the source. This should not have been accepted from AfC. The stimulus for this article presumably is that the company intends to launch branches, and this is part of the advertisement campaign  for them.  DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * delete I find the same hits as the nominator: the references in the article are insufficient, and Ghits are all website directories except one odd hit for a P. D. Eastman book—not Go, Dog. Go! though.
 * Delete Fairly obvious attempt at SEO of something that isn't notable to begin with. All I see is self-generated content. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. --Cerebellum (talk) 16:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.