Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DealsDirect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. However, please note that companies do not need to be extant to be notable, and archived sources do count provided they are otherwise reliable, independent, etc. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

DealsDirect

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. I have got a lot of false positives when looking at this. Boleyn (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable company that expired 13 years ago. Most references have expired and gone to archive, plus final one is dead link. Teraplane (talk) 23:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: This article indicates that the brand was purchased by Ozsale in November 2015, and the current website indicates it is still owned by Ozsale, but there is no article on that firm which could provide an ATD target. AllyD (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are some book mentions but nothing that could be considered significant coverage. Everything else fails WP:ORGCRIT. I checked on Ozsale and do not believe it would qualify under WP:NCORP either. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Considering the original operating company, there was market-share coverage, such as the paragraph in the 2005 Hitwise blog item, but I don't see that or other available coverage regarding the related DealMe, etc. as the substantial coverage needed to demonstrate WP:NCORP. Considering the later operation as an Ozsale brand, coverage such as the ACCC decision linked above is insufficient to demonstrate attained notability for this brand. AllyD (talk) 09:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.