Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deals Today


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Deals Today

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I was unable to find any evidence of a WP:NCORP pass in a search. Provided references are mostly non-independent and also don't address the company in any depth, failing WP:CORPDEPTH requirements. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails NCORP per nomination, this looks like just another advertisement JW 1961 Talk 19:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Probably a G11 - David Gerard (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not remotely notable, created by a COI editor on a self-promo / linkspam spree. - MrOllie (talk) 22:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The first reference is to an article by a Forbes contributor, which is not a reliable source. The second reference is to a press release, which is not a reliable source. Neither even mentions Deals Today. Most of the sources just verify that this website has various types of social media presence. I have not been able to find significant coverage of this website in independent, reliable sources, although Tokyo Business Today wrote "the investor buys ordinary stock deals today" back in 1974, which obviously has nothing at all to do with this topic. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  00:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete unable to find coverage that meets WP:ORG. Creator rage quitting rather than assisting does not inspire confidence that there's sourcing to be found that we're not finding. Star   Mississippi  02:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Probably G11 worthy. Best, GPL93 (talk) 03:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above, possibly G11 worthy. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 21:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references meet WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 14:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.