Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean E. Hallmark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Doolittle Raid. Keeper |  76  14:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Dean E. Hallmark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Redirect, to Doolittle Raid like another Doolittle Raider: Articles for deletion/Thomas C. Griffin. WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTMEMORIAL are applicable in this case. EricSerge (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Redirect to Doolittle Raid. After a search for sources, I couldn't find anything good. – TC N7  JM  02:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Dollittle Raid, fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO1E, and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. TB  randley  (review) 16:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above; however, it would be nice if WP had notability criteria pertaining to people of local interest, whose articles could then be included even if they don't meet the broader notability guidelines.  dci  &#124;  TALK   02:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Doolittle Raid. Subject fails [WP:GNG]] for a standalone article but I'm fine with a redirect....William 13:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable, we cant redirect every non-notable person involved in every military action to the relevant article. MilborneOne (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * There is some precedent here, and the fates of the individual crewmen involved in the Raid has received widespread coverage.  dci  &#124;  TALK   01:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.