Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deanne Panday


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Deanne Panday

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to verify the claims made on the article. Fails to meet WP:AUTHOR. Reliable sources are just passing mentions. The Telegraph doesn't even mention her! ITV source is about Shah Rukh Khan. Hellbrix25 (talk) 18:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now as my searches found results especially News but nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  05:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  10:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  11:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. The various reprinted press releases in the references are essentially worthless for notability The contributor has now been blocked for socking on another bio article.  DGG ( talk ) 21:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.