Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dear Dumb Diary: Live Each Day to the Dumbest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dear Dumb Diary. And no, leaving the Internet Archive link in the history isn't a copyright issue - it's a lending library, they own those books and lend them out digitally. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Dumb Diary: Live Each Day to the Dumbest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual entry of a book series whose only reference is possibly a WP:COPYLINK 00:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  00:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Dear Dumb Diary (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Deletion policy. I was unable to find substantial coverage about Dear Dumb Diary: Live Each Day to the Dumbest that would allow it to pass Notability. Cunard (talk) 05:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect Does not need a seperate article. Ashishkafle (talk) 14:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment from Nominator Why a redirect to the book series article, when other individual book entries don't have one? 14:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The other book in the series could have redirects created to the series article too as they are plausible search terms. I support a redirect to the book series per Redirect, which lists several reasons including:"They have a potentially useful page history ..." – Dear Dumb Diary: Live Each Day to the Dumbest contains potentially useful information in the "Synopsis" section that could be incorporated into the series article."They aid searches on certain terms." – readers who search for this book's title will be directed to the series article, which has information about the book (currently, it's just the book's year of publication but an expanded article could discuss the book more).Cunard (talk) 10:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Could the Internet Archive link be a possible WP:COPYLINK? ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki  (talk | contribs) 14:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.