Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dear Pricey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Dear Pricey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was created on September 26 and speedily deleted on October 27 due to unclear notability (lack of independent sources). The article has just been recreated exactly as before, with no new sources.  General Ization  Talk   12:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment (I am deferring advocating to either Keep or Delete the article at this point in the discussion.) In general, of course, if an article has been speedily deleted and the creator (or another editor) believes the deletion to have been in error, the proper course is to request a deletion review, not simply recreate the article, especially not without addressing any of the issues raised when the original article was tagged for deletion. And when an article was previously deleted due to a valid issue, and the same article is recreated without addressing the issue(s) raised, such an article will generally be deleted again after discussion reaches a consensus to do so. But the article is now here on Wikipedia (again), and so there is an opportunity for to provide reliable sources to establish Dear Pricey's notability. Indeed, I see that in fact AlexWit has already begun attempting to provide such sources — though I have not yet examined the sources to determine whether any of them are actually reliable sources by Wikipedia's definition. I will wait and see how the article develops. — GrammarFascist   contribs talk 12:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication that the subject satisfies WP:NSINGER – no major record label, no notable singles or albums, no awards or award nominations. In addition, the "Career" section is a copyright violation of .  Super Mario  Man  ( talk ) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable unless some credible references appear. YouTube indeed.TheLongTone (talk) 16:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Understandable I'll try again when better references appear. AlexWit —Preceding undated comment added 17:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

As even the creator of the article has now conceded that the subject is not yet sufficiently notable to warrant an article, request speedy delete.  General Ization  Talk   14:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.