Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dear lady


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:08, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Dear lady
this is a colloquial term. suitable for the dictionary Ginar 02:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not even sure it's suitable for the dictionary.  Ruby 02:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not transfer. Gazpacho 03:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 04:09Z 
 * Delete as per Quarl.  (aeropagitica)   07:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Qural. --Terence Ong 10:30, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and Transwiki. Belongs in a dictionary. Ikh (talk) 10:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, stupid. Robin Johnson 13:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not encyclopaedic. Latinus 00:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, article is too short and has no potential. I doubt this is even appropriate for Wikitionary. --Zsinj 03:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.