Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Kills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 09:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Death Kills
Only notable achievement is winning a "best publicity" award. I wonder if this article was part of that? Delete as not notable. &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 2005-12-06 02:25:39Z
 * Delete, not notable 70.21.51.199 02:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm still getting used to formatting articles - anything like that isnt deliberate, so just tell me and ill change it, but please dont delete the entry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gallstoned (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, I doubt we have many Off-Off-Broadway plays on Wikipedia, let alone something that ran for a week at a university. Peyna 04:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Actually the script might be being lisenced next year at some point, so it could go further than just the eone week it ran - its also probably doing the festival circuit next year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gallstoned (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Look, this isn't a formatting issue or anything like that. If it were, someone could just fix it.  The problem is that this play isn't notable enough to be included in an encyclopedic compilation. It's not personal and no one is trying to "get" you or embarrass you, it's a question of Wikipedia policy.  See WP:NOT, especially "Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine" and, as regards future notability, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". TCC (talk) (contribs) 06:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

No, i totally get that, i just figured i'd argue my case. :D Anyway, its up to you guys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gallstoned (talk • contribs)


 * Comment: Thanks for being reasonable about it. We certainly do want you to keep contributing, but I have to agree with the others that a university play that hasn't spread any yet is at this point insufficiently notable for encyclopedic coverage.  If it does get a higher profile or longer running production, by all means present an article on it.  Until then, consider copying over the article into your user page.  Geogre 01:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

No probs - i'll do so when i get the chance, or figure out how... hehe. Worth a try, right? :D


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.